What is behind the weakness of Iranian regime

When the good do nothing, that is enough to be triumph of evil.
These words may apply in any way the escalation of the situation now between Iran and the international community, in the era of President George W. Bush, the Iranian government represented by "Khamenei" and "Ahmadi nejad" Launch statements bursts flagrant nature of the challenge and rejection, but it was characterized by a kind of caution and political flexibility as a precaution against any U.S. decision to strike the Iranian regime, but the tone, "arrogant", which frankly reflects the tendency to totalitarianism and racism of Iranian regime, become more strength and a challenge, after the arrival of American President (Barack Obama) to the White House, this The President presented a dialogue without conditions to the Iranians and showed some sort of recognition of the Iranian regime, when Obama call Iran as (Islamic Republic) on the television in his congratulatory message to the Iranians in the Nowruz festival, and also when the American press leaked the news to the effect that the United States may abandon the requirement of an immediate halt to uranium enrichment for dialogue with Tehran, the Iranian response reminds us of the reactions of Hitler toward coalition (abandonments of British PM Neville Chamberlain) who has shown himself obedient to negotiate with a dictator as Hitler.
Since the election of Obama, the Iranian rhetoric has escalated and Iran launched a satellite with many other rockets, as Iran stepped up and through its Hezbollah allies of public support for terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Jihad and Ahmadinejad provoked an unprecedented stir when he addressed the World Conference Against Racism in Switzerland, it is clear that the message Obama wanted delivery to the Iranians have misunderstood. Iranians leaders saw Osama’s position exactly same Hitler with Chamberlain, in the sense that it reflects the weakness of the U.S. position, and therefore Obama have no choice except negotiation, nothing but this option, and the result here is that to negotiate is just a waste of time.
The Iranian regime since the Iranian revolution, using language without any rational political dimensions, they are accused of all the democratic world, the Great Satan, colonialism, imperialism, and so on, at the same time, we find the Iranian regime has drawn closer to dictators and tyrannical regimes like Russia, China, Cuba, North Korea and the Saudi Arabia closer which the Iranians despite all the dirty policies of this corrupt and sectarian Kingdom addition the Iranian rapprochement with Venezuela, from here out, a political analyst has concluded that the Iranian conception of the global system differs completely from the American perspective, while seeking the United States to spread democracy and human rights culture, the Iranians will seek to restore to the world before the fall of the Berlin Wall, when the communist bloc, and want to challenge the West to swallow the world, here conclude that the confrontation inevitably be forthcoming as long as the Iranian regime amounted to a moral collapse in political engagement.
After the presidential elections in Iran, which show the international community how much the Iranian regime is suffering from weakness paralleled with dilemma of eligibility to reign. The crisis in Iran is not only about political problems, but this crisis coming from Shiite Islam jurisdiction which start separating between policy and religion step by step after the Iranian religious men reach new areas in philosophy. In the Iranian creed there is a separation between the age of twelve Imams and post age of Imams, because without Imams the whole human being have equal and there is no differences between jurists “Fuqaha’a” and other people, in Shi’ism Islam the only people who know all secrets of holy Quran is prophet Mohammed with his household the twelve Imams, this creed really have effect the legitimacy of Iranian regime, the other effect come from Iraqi holy city of Najaf which represent the capital of Shi’ism in the world, Ayatollah Ali Husein Sistani don’t believe in Islamic state and through all his life he was differ from other Mollas, such like Ayatollah Khumeni who build theocratic revolutionist regime in Iran, Ayatollah Sistani separate between state and religion through the age of absence of twelfth Imam till he return with Jesus Christ.


Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.sohel-writer.i8.com

Rate the article
Bad	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Very good
Result : 100%							Participated in the vote : 1